Investigating Students’ Self-Efficacy on the Use of Oral Peer Feedback in Speaking Subject
Keywords:Self-Efficacy, Oral Peer Feedback, Speaking Skill
The study attempted to investigate students' self-efficacy on the use of oral peer feedback in speaking subject. Afterward, The researcher used a questionnaire to find out the level of student self-efficacy in giving oral peer feedback and the interview to find out how students with high and low self-efficacy give their oral peer feedback. This study employed qualitative strategies by using case study. The participants were 25 students who had used oral peer feedback in their speaking subject. The findings revealed that the students’ self-efficacy played such a big role in giving oral peer feedback in speaking subject. Their beliefs influence the process of achieving their goals and their performance as well. Furthermore, students with high self-efficacy tend to believe that they can handle any situation that they face effectively, use certain strategies, and learn from their experiences. Although, the students with low self-efficacy did not have certain strategies to face their performance which lead them into failure. Thus, the failure caused them to feel anxiety, sad, apathetic and worried all the time. Based on the findings self-efficacy has a great effect on the students’ achievement and performance in giving oral peer feedback in speaking subject and even the other courses.
Anggraeny, D., Said, I., & Febriani, B. (2020). The efl students’ perception of their foreign language anxiety in speaking class. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 7(1), 56-57.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Brinkmann, S. (2013). Qualitative interviewing. United States of America: Oxford University Press.
Chowdhury, S., Endres, M., & Lanis, T. W. (2002). Preparing students for success in teamwork environment: the importance of building confidence. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(3), 346-359.
Conger, J. A. & Kanugo, R. K. (1988). The Empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13 (2), 471-182.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S.(2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Diani, I., Yunita, W., & Syafryadin, S. (2019). Interferensi bahasa Indonesia terhadap kemampuan berbicara bahasa Inggris mahasiswa Universitas Bengkulu. In Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra (pp. 164-173).
Kintamani, K., Kurnia, A.D., & Faridah, Didih. (2018). The use of oral peer feedback to minimize the students’ errors in pronouncing english consonant sounds /p/, /f/ and /v/ in reading aloud. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy, 3(1), 22-23.
Lelita, Y. V. (2016). A study on students’ learning strategies and self-efficacy in speaking 1 class in ELESP of Sanata Dharma University. Journal of Language and Literature, 19(1), 61-63.
Maryam, S.I., Kurnia, A.D., & Febriani, B. (2019). Efl Learners’ Perceptions Towards their Self-Efficacy in Learning Public Speaking Course, Journal of English Education and Teaching, 3(3), 377-391.
Mbato, C. L. (2013). Facilitating EFL learners' self-regulation in reading: implementing a metacognitive approach in an Indonesian higher education context. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University.
Noermanzah, Emzir, & Lustyantie, N. (2018). President Joko Widodo’s rhetorical technique of arguing in the presidential speeches of the reform era. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(5), 119. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.5p.117
Noermanzah, N. (2017). Struktur kalimat tunggal bahasa Sindang di Kota Lubuklinggau dan Pengaruhnya dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. AKSIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(1), 2. doi:10.21009/aksis.010101
Noermanzah, N., Syafryadin, S., Castrena, O. W., & Abid, S. (2020). Rhetoric Structure of the Master of Ceremony and the Function of the Akikah Event in Lubuklinggau City. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 4(2), 232-247.
Paradewari, S. D. (2016). Investigating students’ self-efficacy of public speaking. Journal of Language and Literature, 5(10), 97-102.
Rachmawati, E., Faridah, D., & Almira, D. (2018). EFL male and female students’ perception on speaking anxiety in class-oral presentations. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy, 2(2), 57-58.
Smith, S. M. (2002). Using the social cognitive model to explain vocational interest in information technology. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 20(1), 1-9.
Syafryadin, Dian, E. C. Wardhana., Eka Apriani., & Noermanzah. (2020). Maxim Variation, Conventional, and Particularized Implicature on Students’ Conversation. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2) https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/cza8y.
Syafryadin, H., & Salniwati, A. R. A. P. (2019). Digital Storytelling Implementation for Enhancing Students’ Speaking Ability in Various Text Genres. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4), 3147-3151.
Syafryadin, S. (2020). Students’ Strategies in Learning Speaking: Experience of Two Indonesian Schools. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 9(1), 34-47. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/vjv9i14791
Syafryadin, S., Martina, F., Salniwati. (2020). Compensation strategies in speaking activities for non-English department students: poor and competent speakers. Journal of English Education Society. 5(2). 7-14.
Wood, R. & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Ratih Ratih, Andi Rustandi, R. Bunga Febriani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.