An Analysis of Lexical Cohesion Types Used in the Thesis Discussion Section by English Study Program Students
Keywords:Discussion section, lexical cohesion, thesis
The type of this research is descriptive qualitative quantitative research. It is aimed to find out types of lexical cohesion used in the thesis discussion section and to know what is the most dominant lexical cohesion types used in the thesis discussion section. The objects of this study are 20 theses which conducted by English Department undergraduate students who graduated in August 2017 at Bengkulu University. In this research, the researcher collected the data by using checklist. Based on the data, the researcher gets the result that there are 997 lexical items found in 20 theses discussion section that used as research object. It was divided into six types named Repetition, Synonym, Antonym, Hyponym, Meronym and Collocation. They were categorized by Halliday and Hasan’s theory and supporting theory by Paltridge. Besides that, the researcher also found that the most dominant type of lexical item used by the thesis author is Repetition with 691 times from total of lexical cohesion in these theses discussion section
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics, 1934-1951. London: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K & Hasan R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman Group Limited.
Jacobs, H. L., Zingraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfield, V. F., and Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL compositions: a practical approach. Newbury House.
Laufer, B. & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), pp. 307 – 322
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacDonald. Susan Peck. (2007). The Erasure of Language. College Composition and Communication; National Council of Teachers of English.
Malvern, D. and Richards, B. (2012). Measures of lexical richness. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.
Matthews, P.H. (2005). Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. New York: Oxford. University Press.
Paltridge, Brian. (2000). Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Queensland: AEE Publishing.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
Renkema, Jan. (2004). Introduction to Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Siskova, Z (2012). Lexical richness in EFL students’ narratives. Language Studies Working Papers, University of Reading, 4, pp. 26 – 36.
Syafryadin, S. (2019). Contrastive Analysis of Discourse Representation In Indonesia Newspaper (KOMPAS) and English Newspaper Reports (Jakarta Post). ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 3(02), 109-124.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualittative, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Copyright (c) 2020 Daeng Farhan Kurniawan Saputra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.