Improving Students’ Vocabulary Achievement Through Possible Sentence (PS) Strategy

Authors

  • Wiwit Akriani University of Bengkulu
  • Nadrah Institute Agama Islam Negri Bengkulu
  • Riswanto Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu

Keywords:

Possible Sentence, vocabulary

Abstract

The aim of this research was Improving Students’ Vocabulary Achievement through Possible Sentence (PS) Strategy (Classroom Action Research at the fifth Grade Students of 37 Kaur in Academic Year 2017/2018). This study applied Classroom Action Research (CAR) method. The respondents of this research were the Eighth Grade Students of SDN 37 Kaur in Academic year 2017/2018. The data were collected by asking the students to Vocabulary test, observation, interview, and documentation. The result proved that Possible Sentence (PS) Strategy could improve the students’ Vocabulary test at the fifth Grade Students of 37 Kaur in Academic Year 2017/2018. It can be seen from improvement that the students made in test score and the progress of their behavior in the classroom. The students’ average score in pre-assessment test was (61) that included into “Moderate” category; and average score in cycle III test was (76.86) that included into “Good” category. Then, the students’ behavior in learning English was also improved. The students looked silent, serious, and cheerful in the process of teaching and learning, enjoyed the class very much, and had good participation in study group. It means that the students had good interaction with teacher and other students in the classroom. Furthermore, the students learning motivation was better.

References

Arikunto, S.et. Al. (2008). Penelitian Tindak Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksa.

Brunner & Judy. Tilton. (2011). I Don’t Get It!. United Stated: Rowman & Littlefield Education

Buehl, D. (2009). Third Education: classroom Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: CUP.

Burn, A. (1999). Collaborative action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Burton, D & Bartlett, S. (2005). Practitioner Research for Teachers. London Athenaeum.

Elfrieda H. H & Michael K.L (2005). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary, Bringing Research to Practice. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Febriani, R. B. Satinem., Nurnaningsih., Haryani., Syafryadin, Noermanzah.(2020). Conveying an author’s intention to efl readers: The meaning of “The Road Not Taken” by Robert Frost. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change (IJICC), 13(4), 172.

Gusmuliana, P., Apriani, E., Supardan, D. Syafryadin, S., Suhermanto, H. (2020). Compliment Responses in English Made by Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 8 Sekayu. Journal of English Teaching (JET). 5(2), 101-109

Heaton, J.B. (1990). Classroom Testing. New York: Longman Inc.

House R. (2001). Webster’s Collage Dictionary. American United States of America, p.842.

Jack R. C & Willy A. R. (2002). Methodology in Languages Teachings. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). Action Research Planner. Victoria: Daeken University Press

Moore, D. W, & Moore, S.A.(1986. Possible Sentence. In Reading in the Content Areas: Improving Classroom Instruction. Dubuque, 1A: Kendall/Hunt.

Syafryadin, H., & Salniwati, A. R. A. P. Digital Storytelling Implementation for Enhancing Students’ Speaking Ability in Various Text Genres. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE). 8(4), 3147-3151.

Syafryadin, S. (2020). Students’ Strategies in Learning Speaking: Experience of Two Indonesian Schools. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 9(1), 33-46.

Syafryadin, S., Martina, F., & Salniwati, S. (2020). Compensation strategies in speaking activities for non-English department students: poor and competent speakers. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 109-116.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-16