A Grammar of Bisaya in Davao

Authors

  • Mary Jane A Cooke University of Mindanao
  • Ana Helena R Lovitos University of Mindanao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v4i1.362

Keywords:

Applied Linguistics, Bisaya Language Description, Linguistic Features, Philippines

Abstract

This research presents a detailed linguistic description of the Bisaya in Davao language based on the examination of Basic Linguistic Theory. Three primary language consultants are native speakers of the language who translated and recorded word and sentence lists for accurate pronunciation. The analysis reveals the language's phonological, morphological, syntactic, and morphosyntactic characteristics. Based on the translated eliciting materials spoken and pronounced by the language consultants, there are three vowels and sixteen consonants in the phonemic inventory. Distinct phonological characteristics such as minimal pairs, diphthongs, and phonotactics are readily apparent. It demonstrates that the language has morphological characteristics and follows ergative-absolutive and verb Initial structure, precisely like other Austronesian languages in the Philippines. This description provides actual language documentation, additional research on language contact or migration, linguistic typology, and crosslinguistic study. This is vital for students and teachers in DepEd Davao in teaching the Bisaya in Davao as a mother tongue.

References

Atos, E. G., et al. (2015). A Grammatical Sketch of Hinigakit.

Barlow, R. (2020). A sketch grammar of Pondi. ANU Press.

Eberhard, D. M., Fennig, C.D, & Simons. (2022). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Twenty-fifth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International.

Retrieved from: http://www.ethnologue.com.

Hinton, L., Huss, L. M., & Roche, G. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of language revitalization (p. 1). New York: Routledge.

Jubilado, R. (2021). Comparative Ergative and Accusative Structures in Three Philippine Languages. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 26(1), 1–18.

Justeson, J. S., & Kaufman, T. (1993). A decipherment of Epi-Olmec hieroglyphic writing. Science, 259(5102), 1703-1711.

Klessa, K., & Nau, N. (2014). Compilation of Language Resources and On-Line Dissemination of Knowledge about Endangered Languages and Linguistic Heritage. In Human Language Technologies–The Baltic Perspective (pp. 192–195). IOS Press.

Lobel, J. and Pouezevara, S. (2021). Characteristics of Select Philippine Mother Tongue Languages Used in Basic Education Teaching and Learning https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00XBQ5.pdf

Rogers, C., & Campbell, L. (2015). Endangered languages. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.

Rubrico, J. G. U. (2012). Indigenization of Filipino: The case of the Davao City variety. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya

The linguistics department of the University of the Philippines (Diliman) (UP Department of Linguistics. (2018a). The Revised 615-Word List. Quezon City, PH: Department of Linguistics, University of the Philippines (2018b). A 505-Word List. Quezon City, PH: Department of Linguistics, University of the Philippines (2018c). The 775-Sentence List. Quezon City, PH: Department of Linguistics, University of the Philippines

Downloads

Published

2023-03-11

How to Cite

Cooke, M. J. A., & Lovitos, A. H. R. (2023). A Grammar of Bisaya in Davao. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 4(1), 188-197. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v4i1.362